On Sunday 10 April 2005 8:35 pm, David Hampton wrote: > Hi all, > > I wanted to find out if anyone objects to switching the G2 branch from a > target of FC1/EL3 to a target of FC3/EL4.
OK, I'm nowhere on the GUI stakes, I know, but I do prefer the look of Gtk 2.4 to Gtk 2.2 - the file chooser dialog that I put in before and which turned out to be 2.4 was very handy with it's storage of favourite locations. > We're still looking at a > release six months from now, Phew! That means I can go on my summer break in June and still have plenty of time to finish what I need. Great idea. UK biased, maybe, but I'd like bonfire night - 5th November, gunpowder, treason and plot etc. GnuCash and Debian can finally put Gnome1.2 to sleep. RIP. > FC1 FC3 > glib2 2.2 2.6 > gtk2 2.2 2.4 > gnome 2.4 2.8 > glade2 2.0 2.6 > libglade2 2.0 2.4 Fine by me. > I don't have any other distributions handy to know how these new > requirements compare. Debian testing: libglib2.0-0 2.6.3-1 libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4 libgnome2-0 2.8.1-2 glade-2 2.6.8-2 libglade2-0 2.4.2-2 What version of libxml2 is on FC3? Debian testing has 2.6.16-6 -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.dcglug.org.uk/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgp0OsPsZXwvH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
