On Saturday 23 April 2005 3:38 pm, Derek Atkins wrote: > > What's it doing in libqof in the first place? > > > > Shall I remove it and leave it in GnuCash src/engine only? > > I don't know. I suspect it's in libqof because Linas copied all of > src/engine and pared out the stuff that was gnucash-specific.. But > freqspec wasn't necessarily gnucash-specific. Indeed, I can certainly see > using freqspec to define palm calendar recurrences, no?
Precisely why I started looking at FreqSpec when I was intending to get the QSF maps finished! Having something like this will make datebooks easier. I just don't think it needs to be in the library - it can just as easily be in the application along with all the other objects. That would certainly make more sense. > Personally I don't have a strong opinion on what stays in libqof and what > stays in src/engine. I dont have as clear a dividing line in my mind as > you do in yours. To me, QOF - as a library - shouldn't pre-define objects that are not fundamental to it's purpose. It defines books, collections and sessions but you cannot have QOF without those. I'll remove FreqSpec from QOF next commit. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.dcglug.org.uk/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpMQKokVNpM5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
