"Edward J. Huff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is what I think now: after a delete split, the cursor
> should always end up on the next split after the one which
> was deleted. Any other behavior is counterintuitive and
> unexpected. The above minor disaster does not happen if
> the cursor acts as it ought to.
>
> Unless anyone can tell me why it shouldn't do that, (or that
> it's already fixed in g2 -- I haven't built g2 yet...), I'll
> file a bug report so it gets on the to-do list. Probably
> I will also fix it but maybe not immediately.
Sounds reasonable to me.
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
