On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:22:53AM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: > Quoting Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Personally, I'd be willing to forgo all the in-dev code (book-closing, > > lots, budgeting and DB-backend) in order to get the next release out the > > door, in order to unblock starting those other changes. > > I've already given up on the DB backend for the first g2 release.. I think > book-closing is already there, but I'm not sure. I also think lots are there, > but I'm not sure, either. Budgetting I'm willing to forego, but I'm also > willing to get it in if that finishes "on time".
Regarding Budgeting: I've been pretty pleased with the state of my patchset for a couple months now. The budget system seems stable and doesn't seem to be missing any essential features. I'd been holding off pushing them because they involve more "rearchitecting" than I think you're comfortable with. E.g. Recurrences are intended to be a much simpler replacement for FreqSpec. If you'd like, I can email the patchset to -patches. One TODO is that I haven't looked into what's necessary to make budgets work with qof-merge stuff. BTW, my mini-projects at the moment are 1) looking at what's needed to remove GnomeCanvas from the register. 2) looking at what's needed to move the execution entry-point from guile to a C main. But more 1) than 2). -chris > > -derek > > -- > Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory > Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) > URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH > [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available > _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
