On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 03:49:03PM -0400, David Hampton wrote: > On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 15:03 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote: > > > Incidentally, is this behavior specific to g2? I've never noticed it > > in 1.x, but I imagine the register code hasn't changed much. > > It was added in HEAD and pulled into g2. Derek thinks the blank split > code should be rewritten. I'm for reverting the change to the > transaction scrubbing code that created the problem.
Nice to know I'm not imagining things. The blank split code *is* particularly bad, but I think the effort to fix/rewrite it in the current register is probably 50% of the effort to rewrite the whole register. I looked pretty deeply into the register code a couple months ago and I don't remember seeing any relatioship between transaction scrubbing code and the transaction dirtying. Could you point me toward what you mean? -chris > David _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
