Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tuesday 19 July 2005 5:25 pm, Neil Williams wrote: >> Whilst CashUtil is presently a separate tree, I have an eye on the changes >> that would be required to fold it into GnuCash whilst retaining a separate >> package, in effect making a gnucash-common package > > OK, I realise there is a gnucash-common package (at least on > Debian), although it includes a lot of .h and test files so I don't > really follow the reasoning (seems more like a -devel). > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/gnome/gnucash-common
It is standard Debian procedure to try and separate out architecture-independent parts of a package so that we can save space in the archive. So gnucash-common has the bits that are the same on every architecture (and thus don't need to be duplicated). gnucash-common is 2.8 MB right now, thus saving something like 40MB by not duplicating it for each architecture. _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
