On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 12:22:30AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: <snip> > It's ironic that we are spending so much time discussing this now when there > is so much pressure for G2.
Actually, I think it's rather predictable. It's usually when you really want a process to work well that you realize how poorly it works. <snip> > > I guess that's the key of what I'm saying: I don't believe that making > > codebase simplification the #1 priority will achieve codebase > > simplification. However, making "something else" the #1 priority > > *will* achieve codebase simplification incidentally. > > Does that "something else" have to be the same for everyone? As long as the > aims and standards of the code simplification are established, does it > matter? *If* I'm right, then yes, it matters a lot. Very few goals will lead to a healthier project. We have no shortage of good intentions and diligence and we've been talking about codebase simplification for a long time. I think the current path will take us in exactly the direction we've been heading, at pretty much the same pace we've been moving, which will mean a slow, slow death. -chris _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
