"Stuart D. Gathman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > >> > Scripts should be understandable by humans with minimal >> > or no introduction to the language. This may leave out otherwise >> > very elegant languages like Prolog and pure functional languages. >> > o This may also leave out languages with postfix or prefix based syntax. >> > o Infix languages with no operator precedence are probably also out >> > (e.g. Smalltalk, APL). >> >> What does that mean? Humans who have programming experience or humans >> who don't? > > It means that if you show a script to lots of programmers who are unfamiliar > with the script language, and ask them to guess what a script does, > a large percentage of them guess correctly.
Ah, so you mean it's written in Visual Basic. Seriously, *what* set of programmers? _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
