Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 14:32 -0800, Bill Wohler wrote: > > Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> - Branch/tag Naming: it seems like a rename ["gnucash-1-6-branch" -> > > >> "gnucash/branches/1.6"] is reasonable. Last-minute objections? > > > > That is the normal method. I'd also expect to see gnucash/tags/1.8.12 > > and HEAD in gnucash/trunk. > > Ah, Bill, you might not have seen > http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/2005-October/014333.html > which has details about the repository layout and the question re: renaming.
Sorry, I don't follow the -devel list. I'd definitely drop the gnucash- prefix from the tags and branches. It will make for a much cleaner repository and it will sort a lot better. (In other words, no objections to your proposal above. ;-) If someone is really interested in the history, they can easily get it with "svn log" and "svn ls -r". -- Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian! If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane. _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
