On Monday 07 November 2005 4:04 pm, Derek Atkins wrote: > Is there any particular reason the libqof move wasn't /ONE/ changeset?
To separate the Makefile.am changes from the simply copying of the files. I didn't want people to have to sift through a >1Mb diff to find what's been changed in configure.in or src/engine/Makefile.am so I committed those first. I couldn't then use svn move because I had to have tested with the files already moved, so I used svn remove and svn add. > Also, this is why IMHO you should use an lndir tree for builds so that > you don't > accidentally add in temp-files. lndir ? Sorry, I don't know what that means. :-( P.S. It's testing fine so far after r11883. I'm building two trees, one with external QOF, one with internal. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpbNtqFBQYbW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
