On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 11:15 +0100, Christian Stimming wrote: > did you read the discussion on > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=321405 ?
Nope, I didn't see that at all. > "Actually the *_full* account sets do make some sense. These (or at > least of the *full* files) was the original gnucash data-file which was > used to create the full account hierarchy. The other subsets were then > cut'n'pasted from there. This original file therefore does have some > value if someone wants to heavily modify the full account tree." > > Or why did you change the content of the de_DE directory? I've reverted the deletions of the acctchrt_full.gnucash-xea files and re-added the EXTRA_DIST Makefile.am rules relating to these files in r12269. I removed de_DE/acctchrt_full.gnucash-xea because I thought I removed the C/acctchrt_full.gnucash-xea as well ... but looking over r12263 now I don't see that as having happened. :/ In any case, they're now back and referenced. As well, I've applied the relevant sub-patch of 321405 as r12270. Thanks... -- ...jsled http://asynchronous.org/ - `a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
