On Wednesday 11 January 2006 11:05 pm, Derek Atkins wrote: > However, I do want to ask how this distraction is going to help get > G2 out the door? And yes, I do consider this is a distraction right now.
Well, if we want a C binary to replace the scripts for G2, then it's fairly complete. From your reaction, I assume we don't now? I thought we did last week. It's not dependent on cashutil, it could be implemented in trunk without all the other cashutil build stuff. It just uses some code that I developed for cashutil/pilot-qof. (i.e. the CLI component works). > Once G2 is out the door, great, let's work full bore on this, but right > now we REALLY REALLY REALLY need to get G2 finished. I thought part of that was to replace the init scripts with C. It's a bit of a change of direction in just a week, that's all. It's safely hidden on the branch so it won't get in anyone's way. I'll find something else if a standalone gnucash2 C binary is not to be part of G2. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpPv1wOaDOtA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
