On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 06:22:21PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: > Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 05:58:01PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: > >>FWIW, I still want to see enough of gnome initialized earlier such > >>that the splash screen can get instantiated earlier. You removed my > >>gnucash-bin.c comment about "start the splash screen here" in your > >>recent set of commits... But my comment still stands. I want the > >>splash screen up BEFORE you call load_gnucash_modules(). > > > >I think that in the commit that I removed that comment, it _was_ > >before module loading, but then I moved it after because of the > >report-menu setup. I know the goal is to show the modules loading in > >the splash. > > I see no instance of "gnc_show_splash_screen" in gnucash-bin.c in any > form.. So when you moved stuff around you removed my comment completely.
It's the first thing that happens inside gnc_main_gui_init(). When that was called before loading modules, the module loading messages showed on the splash. But, the report menu was never populated. > Also, I'm not keen on your moving all these plugin-page defs from > gnome-utils into gnome. They really don't belong in gnome. They > belong in gnome-utils. Let me repeat: EVERYTHING belongs in > gnome-utils unless there is a specific library requirement that > makes it necessary to live in "gnome". But if you can keep it in > gnome-utils and add a context callback, that's sufficient. The problem I'm running into isn't so much with the register as with the report-system. Application startup and tear-down touches everything - including the report-system. I moved half of it from gnome into gnome-utils, but I think that was a mistake. It should stay in gnome. But, that pulls the thread... what about the stuff in gnome-utils that tried to manage lifecycle - specifically, gnc-file and gnc-main-window? The plugins, pluginpages and pluginmanager all end up depending on these. Although, at the moment I can't remember the exact dependency chain, so I'm going to start-over and try to take better notes. > The plugin page code most certainly belongs in gnome-utils, not gnome. > top-level depends on the plugin-page... not the other way around. Well then, maybe gnc-plugin-page-account-tree, gpp-budget, gp-basic-commands, gp-account-tree, and gp-budget belong in gnome-utils. In the short term, I'm really not bent on re-organizing the libraries. I just want the lifecycle functions in one place, and, after moving them to gnome-utils, I'm convinced they need to go back into gnome. Let me take another look at what they minimum dependencies are. -chris _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
