[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > Honestly, I don't know. I've never seen it cause a problem. In fact > all my development (on FC3) has used g-wrap 1.3.4. Unforunately the > g-wrap-1.9.6 configure script doesn't properly detect the lack of glib1, > so it tries to build it even when it's not able to (which is the cause of > the g-wrap build error). I'm not sure whether gnucash2 requires the g-wrap > glib bindings... But you can certainly build g-wrap against glib2 with > that small configure modification.
Another silly question - what does 1.9.6 buy you? For FC, I'm still at 1.3.x, mainly because of inertia (well, and the fact that if we're going to build libffi, it should probably come from the compiler tree.) - 1.3.x seems to work fine. Bill _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
