Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (*) This really should be fixed: the template-transaction accounts
> should probably be a more literal mirror of the real account tree, in
> terms of types and commodities. The whole point of using real Accounts
> and Transactions for the template transactions was to leverage the
> editor (register) and the implicit application constraints for the
> template transactions ... I didn't want to re-implment or re-specify a
> bunch of logic around "template" transactions seperate from "real"
> transactions, and especially not the register component. But for a few
> reasons, they did diverge. In any case, it'd be nice if they were
> closer together, but that's not a focus of the branches/sx-cleanup/,
> right now.
I'm hoping that with the "register rewrite" it'll be much easier
to create a register for different data types just by creating
the appropriate data model. Granted, the original register was
an attempt to do that, but I dont think it was abstracted at
the right places.
I haven't looked at Chris' work to see how much easier it'll be....
But I'm still hopeful.
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
