On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 22:06 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote: > Invoices basically reuse the engine objects. But SXs have: > struct TTInfo_s [...] > which look suspiciously like a Transaction, and > > struct TTSplitInfo_s [...] > which looks suspiciously like a Split. And then the whole duplicated > accounts setup.
These structures aren't the actual storage, and are only barely used as runtime representations of Template [Splits and] Transactions. They were sourced from Robert Merkel's work on the "SX-from-transaction" dialog, and are used (by my hand) in the Mortgage/Loan Druid. In both cases, they're immediately passed to xaccSchedXactionSetTemplateTrans(...), which just converts these degenerate structures into the "real" template Transactions. Looking back on it, I'd just the calling code to write the template structures directly, though maybe with some convenience functions for readability. The only structures relevant are the Accounts, Transactions and Splits rooted in the "Template" Account-Group. -- ...jsled http://asynchronous.org/ - `a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
