On Friday 26 January 2007 12:50, Ethy H. Brito wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:17:39 +0100 > > Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In particular, as you've mentioned OFX here, > > http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-user/2007-January/019062.html > > I would strongly suggest to simply add a numerical comparison (in > > additiona to the string comparison) in import-backend.c, as this > > achieves your original goal of "good scores to imported transactions" > > obviously much much easier. > > I agree and already did that. It is working. > > But somebody (maybe yourself) stated that "perhaps the importer could try > to be more intelligent" and I simply offered to give my 2 cents. > > If you think this is not necessary (maybe this is a "problem" complained by > myself only) I am satisfied with my (unsent) small patch. My sole intention > was to contribute. ;-)
I think it's definitely worth ending your small patch. Just be carefull about the failure mode, so that it doesn't do a numerical conversion on text strings and then conclude that 0=0. Auto-increment is, IMHO a completely different problem. I do use alphanumerical values in ther check number regularily, but I never thought that GnuCash could increment them for me, so I have no opinion on how/if it should do it. -- Benoit Grégoire Technologies Coeus inc.
pgpri0c6ODIRa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
