Hello. I'm new here. What do I need to know (technically) in order to translate the "GnuCash Tutorial and Concepts Guide" to Spanish. I'm talking mainly about the links and formatting.
Any advice? Thanks 2007/4/8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Send gnucash-devel mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of gnucash-devel digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. PATCH: fix KVP bug/allow gnc_numeric to be a GBoxed value > (Phil Longstaff) > 2. PATCH: convert some routines to take const object pointers > (Phil Longstaff) > 3. Re: r15849 - gnucash/trunk/src/business/business-core - Fix > compiler complaints about dereferencing type-punned pointers. > (Derek Atkins) > 4. GDA: Recent SX changes in trunk/GObject questions (Phil Longstaff) > 5. Re: SX: Created Transactions not removed from SLR list > (Volker Englisch) > 6. Re: GDA: Recent SX changes in trunk/GObject questions > (Derek Atkins) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 14:18:58 -0400 (EDT) > From: Phil Longstaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: PATCH: fix KVP bug/allow gnc_numeric to be a GBoxed value > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > The attached patch does two things: > > 1) Fixes a KVP bug where kvp_frame_add_value_nc() wouldn't properly create > a frame which didn't previously exist. The problem was that by the time the > routine realized it needed to create the path, the variable holding the path > had been overwritten. > > 2) Add support to allow a gnc_numeric to be stored as a GBoxed > value. Needed for GDA branch, but might as well move into the trunk as part > of the GObjectification. > > Phil > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: diffs > Type: application/octet-stream > Size: 2303 bytes > Desc: 2814508393-diffs > Url : > http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/attachments/20070407/06a40d22/attachment-0001.obj > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 14:26:58 -0400 (EDT) > From: Phil Longstaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: PATCH: convert some routines to take const object pointers > To: GnuCash development list <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > The attached patch modifies some getter routine signatures to convert > object pointers to const object pointers. > > Phil > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: diffs > Type: application/octet-stream > Size: 15603 bytes > Desc: 2814508393-diffs > Url : > http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/attachments/20070407/d9d9adef/attachment-0001.obj > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 17:30:52 -0400 > From: Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: r15849 - gnucash/trunk/src/business/business-core - Fix > compiler complaints about dereferencing type-punned pointers. > To: [email protected], David Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed" > > This can't work.. A GncOwner isn't a QofInstance. > > -derek > > Quoting David Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Author: hampton > > Date: 2007-04-07 14:24:53 -0400 (Sat, 07 Apr 2007) > > New Revision: 15849 > > Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/15849 > > > > Modified: > > gnucash/trunk/src/business/business-core/gncInvoice.c > > Log: > > Fix compiler complaints about dereferencing type-punned pointers. > > > > > > Modified: gnucash/trunk/src/business/business-core/gncInvoice.c > > =================================================================== > > --- gnucash/trunk/src/business/business-core/gncInvoice.c 2007-04-07 > > 16:12:31 UTC (rev 15848) > > +++ gnucash/trunk/src/business/business-core/gncInvoice.c 2007-04-07 > > 18:24:53 UTC (rev 15849) > > @@ -484,15 +484,21 @@ > > static QofInstance* > > qofInvoiceGetOwner (GncInvoice *invoice) > > { > > + GncOwner *owner; > > + > > if(!invoice) { return NULL; } > > - return QOF_INSTANCE(&invoice->owner); > > + owner = &invoice->owner; > > + return QOF_INSTANCE(owner); > > } > > > > static QofInstance* > > qofInvoiceGetBillTo (GncInvoice *invoice) > > { > > + GncOwner *billto; > > + > > if(!invoice) { return NULL; } > > - return QOF_INSTANCE(&invoice->billto); > > + billto = &invoice->billto; > > + return QOF_INSTANCE(billto); > > } > > > > Timespec gncInvoiceGetDateOpened (GncInvoice *invoice) > > > > _______________________________________________ > > gnucash-changes mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-changes > > > > > > -- > Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory > Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) > URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH > [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 22:33:05 -0400 (EDT) > From: Phil Longstaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: GDA: Recent SX changes in trunk/GObject questions > To: GnuCash development list <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > I've merged up-to-date trunk into the gda branch (though it's not > completely committed). Scheduled transaction structure has changed. In > addition, account groups have been replaced by root accounts. > > My plan is to have a book table with a record with (currently) two > fields. The first is the root account guid and the second is the template > root account guid. This will allow template accounts to be added to the > main account table and template transactions/splits to be added to the main > tx/split tables, since they can be traced up via the account parent guids to > the correct root. > > Comments? > > Questions about use of GObjects in GC. Is the plan to base backends on > GObjects as well? Also, does it make sense to replace the whole begin > edit/commit edit architecture with an architecture where "object changed" > events are caught and acted upon by the GDA backend but not the file > backend? > > Phil > > P.S. One side effect of the merge is that I am not seeing the crash I used > to see when saving a transaction via gda. The crash was happening because > splits were being sorted, which was triggering more db access, and > eventually he whole mess got corrupted. > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 10:55:34 -0400 > From: Volker Englisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: SX: Created Transactions not removed from SLR list > To: Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: gnucash-devel <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > On 03/15/2007 10:19 AM Josh Sled wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 01:59 -0400, Volker Englisch wrote: > >> Strange thing happened: It looks like some of my transactions were > >> incorrectly scheduled for Jan. 1st. > ... > > > > > Hmm, well that's wrong. I guess the handful of SXes I'm testing against > > aren't sufficient ... I'll come up with a better test suite. > > > > Looking through my list of scheduled transactions it appears that all of > these transactions that were incorrectly set to January 1st were > originally entered to be scheduled annually. Since the option to > schedule a transaction annually doesn't exist anymore (at least I think > the older version allowed you to schedule annually) they got converted > to 'monthly (x12)' and this 'conversion' may have changed the actual > date to Jan 1st. > > Along these lines, when I click the up/down arrow in the 'Edit Scheduled > Transaction' window to increment/decrement the recurrence frequency for > 'Every N months' > it seems that all but the 'weekly' option increments the value by two > instead of one. > > The display of this option is centered (?) under the 'Start Date' field > for most options except for the 'Semi-monthly', where it is left aligned > with the fields in that block. > > Also, the window that comes up to enter/edit a scheduled transaction > extends the width of the screen and there is a new button at the upper > right-hand corner of the calendar name 'View' which doesn't do anything > at the current time. > > Please let me know if you'd like me to provide additional information > and/or screenshots. > > I am seeing these with GC r15839 on 2007-04-05 (on FC5) > > -- > Volker > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 11:40:15 -0400 > From: Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: GDA: Recent SX changes in trunk/GObject questions > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Phil Longstaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: GnuCash development list <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed" > > Hi, > > Quoting Phil Longstaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I've merged up-to-date trunk into the gda branch (though it's not > > completely committed). Scheduled transaction structure has changed. > > In addition, account groups have been replaced by root accounts. > > Yep, we know :) > > > My plan is to have a book table with a record with (currently) two > > fields. The first is the root account guid and the second is the > > template root account guid. This will allow template accounts to be > > added to the main account table and template transactions/splits to > > be added to the main tx/split tables, since they can be traced up via > > the account parent guids to the correct root. > > > > Comments? > > You probably want more that just those entries in the book table. > Indeed, the tables should probably more closely mirror the actual > objects. > > > Questions about use of GObjects in GC. Is the plan to base backends > > on GObjects as well? > > No. The Backends aren't objects, they're plugins. > > > Also, does it make sense to replace the whole begin edit/commit > > edit architecture with an architecture where "object changed" events > > are caught and acted upon by the GDA backend but not the file backend? > > No, or at least, not for a LONG while. I think we'll probably emit > changed events with commit_edit(), but I dont think the backend should > use that. > > > Phil > > > > P.S. One side effect of the merge is that I am not seeing the crash I > > used to see when saving a transaction via gda. The crash was > > happening because splits were being sorted, which was triggering more > > db access, and eventually he whole mess got corrupted. > > Bugs gets fixed. Imagine that! ;) > > -derek > > -- > Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory > Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) > URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH > [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel > > > End of gnucash-devel Digest, Vol 49, Issue 10 > ********************************************* > _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
