Quoting Chris Lyttle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> Log: >>> Tagging the 2.1.0 release of GnuCash >>> >>> Copied: gnucash/tags/2.1.0 (from rev 15912, gnucash/trunk) >> >> Wouldn't it make more sense if we tagged the revision that was >> released? I'm not sure which revision that actually was, but it seems >> like it might have been close to 15894. >> > It was 15892, hmm I thought that's what I did as I didnt update my tree > when I tagged it. Damm :-(
I suppose the command that you used was "svn copy svn+ssh://..../trunk ...../tags/2.1.0"? In that case this would use trunk's latest revision, regardless of your current working copy's revision. The command for tagging a specific revision (according to Derek, http://lists.gnucash.org/logs/2007-04-16.html#T18:04:17 ) would be "svn copy svn+ssh://...../[EMAIL PROTECTED] .....tags/2.1.0". Just for the record :-) Christian _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
