Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Ah, good.  Thanks for indulging me.  This all sounds like it's exactly
> the best one can expect, given the necessity of changing the format in
> the first place.

It could be better ... 1.8/2.0 could (non-)silently ignore XML sub-trees that
they did not understand.  Then, 2.2 could emit both the old (FreqSpec) and
new (Recurrence) structures and the files would be backward-compatible.  Of
course, it'd be custom, new code to generate a FreqSpec from a Recurrence,
and there are features of the Recurrence that can't be expressed in a
FreqSpec, but only if used could 2.2 refuse to save in pre-2.2 format.

Unfortunately, our XML error handling sucks.

-- 
...jsled
http://asynchronous.org/ - a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Attachment: pgpisPqizQuHN.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Reply via email to