On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 09:22:54PM +0100, Christian Stimming wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 31. Oktober 2007 18:34 schrieb Mike Alexander: > > >> This is perfectly fine! Thanks a lot. I've checked some reports here > > >> that turn out identical to before (notably balance-sheet, > > >> account-summary and income-statement), so hopefully all of the > > >> reports are at least as correct as before. Thank you very much. > > > > > > I think that's reasonable. And thanks for following up on this. It > > > makes me happy to contribute something really useful... > > > > I had started down the same path some time ago but never finished it. > > Here is a patch that combines what I did with these changes. The main > > difference is to use a hash table instead of a list to save the account > > balances. This cuts another 11% or so off the time for my balance > > sheet report. > > Thanks a lot for this addition. As you said, the additional speed-up is > probably only noticable if you measure the time, but nevertheless a hash > table is a good thing. Committed as r16577.
that's still 3 seconds in my world... great! A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
