On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 09:15:46PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 11:19:16PM -0500, David Reiser wrote: > > > > On Jan 2, 2008, at 8:43 PM, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > > >>> a few lines above the scm that appeared in the last report, I get: > >>> > >>> * 17:59:57 DEBUG <gnc.scm> b-list is ((#<<gnc-numeric> num: 4189799520000 > >>> denom: 204700000000> . #<<gnc-numeric> num: 72682214900000000 denom: > >>> 418979952000000>)) b-units is #<<gnc-numeric> num: 0 denom: 10000> > >>> b-value > >>> is #<<gnc-numeric> num: 0 denom: 100> b-method is average-basis > >> > >> You have a txn with no shares and no value in the split that touches > >> this account. What is the other side of that transaction? What are you > >> trying to do with that txn? > >> > >> It's a real bug, no doubt, but I want to make sure it gets handled > >> properly -- there is no code to handle that case, duh, so its > >> <#unspecified>. So if you can find that txn, and tell what it looks > >> like and what its trying to do, then I can fix it straight-away. > > > > > > OK. My error. But the register wasn't complaining, either. What happened > > was: 3 years ago, I couldn't figure out why my tracking of my wife's > > TIAA-CREF contributions left me 0.002 shares low in one of her three funds. > > So I added 0.002 shares at zero cost. Probably would have worked out right > > if I had used the stock split wizard, but I didn't think of that. It has > > been tracking fine since (and I now import all the transactions via > > ofx...). > > > > It turns out I had both the 0.002 shares and the 0 value balancing split > > coming out of the stock fund account. (Remember, the register wasn't > > complaining, and no imbalance account.). Once I put the $0 split into the > > parent 'brokerage' account, the report works. >
I've been thinking more about this. Can you provide more details on this transaction? A proper stock-split txn has only one split (I know, weird) with just the number of shares added or removed. I'm just curious to know exactly how it was structured so I can see exactly what the code patch was for that txn. A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
