I have no objection to either using l10n.gnome.org or re-adding POTFILES.in to SVN. Even though POTFILES.in is generated every time, I suspect that it wouldn't change from run to run, so we should be fine. Worst case I think we could just run a 'sort' to make sure it gives consistent output every time. So I have no objection.
-derek Quoting Claude Paroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > Seeing that you had some problems in integrating translation status of > GNUCash in the Translation project, I'd like to propose you to integrate > http://l10n.gnome.org to track translation status of GNUCash. > > I've already discussed this matter with Christian Stimming, and the main > drawback we currently see is the necessity to have POTFILES.in committed > in the SVN, like we do for all other GNOME apps, unless intltool-update > fails. > > The Damned Lies app that powers up the l10n.gnome.org website allows to > have almost real-time status from SVN (HEAD or branches). > See e.g. http://l10n.gnome.org/module/gedit > Translators only need to download the already merged po files (or pot > file for a fresh new language) to begin complete a translation. It's > very straightforward, even for non-technical people. > We could then add a note specific to GNUCash where to submit files > (bugzilla or email address). > > Moreover, this could also boost GNUCash translations, taking advantage > of GNOME translation team's momentum. > > Cheers, > > Claude > -- > www.2xlibre.net > > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel > _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
