Am Mittwoch, 6. August 2008 18:43 schrieb Charles Day: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Charles Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Sorry, yes, you're right. Here's a corrected second table: > >> > >> round force_fit decimal non-decimal > >> ===== ========= ======= ============= > >> 0 0 0.999 0 + 1/3 > >> 1 0 1.000 0 + 1/3 > >> 0 1 0.999 0.333 *a better example might be 2/3 > >> (prints as 0.666) > >> 1 1 1.000 0.333 *a better example might be 2/3 > >> (prints as 0.667) > > > > While I'm at it, shall I make 1/3 print simply as "1/3" instead of "0 + > > 1/3" in the first two cases? > > Can anyone confirm the intended meaning of the force_fit option? Shall I go > ahead with these changes?
I can't confirm the *intended* meaning, but your explained meaning makes perfect sense to me. IMHO you can go ahead with these changes. Regards Christian _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
