On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 01:35:30PM -0800, Charles Day wrote: > Could someone enlighten me as to the state of the register rewrite, or point > me to some kind of "readme" about it? I would like to know what the approach > was, where things left off, etc. > I had a quick look at the register-rewrite branch. My first impression is > that the original register code has not been changed at all and that some > kind of new stuff based on GtkTreeView was being worked on. Is it the > intention to abandon a GUI-independent register design for a Gtk+ dependent > version?
Yes, exactly. At the time, it was somewhat of a feasibility study, as GtkTreeViews were still a little new and there weren't too many examples of good implementations that used 1000s+ of entries. These days, it's not really a question of the quality of the gtk+ bits. I haven't had the time to work on it (or any other part of GnuCash) for quite a while now. IIRC, last time I worked on it, I got copy and pasting of transactions working, which was pretty low on my priority list, so I think it's probably usable, though not polished. -chris > > Cheers, > Charles > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
