Am Freitag, 11. Dezember 2009 schrieb Geert Janssens: > I think it will be alright in this case, because: > * It works ok, I have tested that.
Yes. > * The dialog has been reworked fairly intensively, so even if it was > written in glade-2 format, a diff with the original dialog would > essentially show the new file. I mean the svn diff history would be > equally meaningless if the new glade file was still in glade-2 format as > it is now. Yes, I agree - I wouldn't expect a "more readable" svn diff result even in glade-2. However, there was the question of backward compatibility of the glade-3 files. Is our minimum libglade version sufficient for using the glade-3 files? This might very well be the case, but I don't know. If this question can be answered with yes, of course you can commit glade-3 files right away already now. Christian > > But I ask anyway... > > Geert > _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
