On Mar 22, 2010, at 10:54 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what's the reason for the differentiation between
> GTK_QUARTZ
> and other GTK implementations below ?
>> +#ifdef GTK_QUARTZ
>> + gnc_main_window_connect(window, page, tab_hbox, label);
>> +#else
>> gnc_main_window_connect(window, page, event_box, label);
>> -
>> +#endif
>> LEAVE("");
>> }
>>
>
> And I wonder why you removed the "TRUE" part in the code below:
>> @@ -3212,7 +3213,7 @@
>> priv->notebook = gtk_notebook_new ();
>> g_object_set(G_OBJECT(priv->notebook),
>> "scrollable", TRUE,
>> - "enable-popup", TRUE,
>> + "enable-popup",
>> (char *)NULL);
>> gtk_widget_show (priv->notebook);
>> g_signal_connect (G_OBJECT (priv->notebook), "switch-page",
> Does that also have something to do with Quartz ?
The first is cruft (GTK_QUARTZ isn't the macro, it's GDK_QUARTZ, so that bit
will never build) and the second is a mistake. I'll have a cleanup checked in
as soon as the check build completes.
Thanks for catching them.
Regards,
John Ralls
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
