On 25 Mar 2010, at 11:51 PM, Cam KELLY wrote:
My brother speaks highly of your software and I have a question.
Why is gnucash available for free and/or donation ? I have a limited
understanding of the GNU Software License but if I understand
correctly, you are not required by the license to make gnucash
available "at-no-cost".
I am a software developer with mid-career experience (about 3
years) and have read 'The Success of Open Source' by Steve Weber and
other on-line commentaries at gnu.org. The police I worked with
previously were leery of open-source software and I continue to
transition to independent work : www.CambridgeSoftware.biz.
There are two components to the cost of software, the cost of
developing it, and the cost of maintaining it. Over time, the cost of
maintaining the software by far and away exceeds the cost of
developing it.
The traditional "commercial" model is to sell you the software
outright, however this doesn't cover the ongoing maintenance of the
software, so the company needs to find a way to sell you the same
software again and again. A common approach is to keep making
arbitrary changes to the software to keep coming up with new products
to resell, and this is really wasteful.
The open source model is based on a focus on recovering the
maintenance cost instead of the development cost, so you'll find the
key ways open source companies make money is through charging for
ongoing support. Because there is no pressure to arbitrarily change
software for change's sake to generate new sales, you'll find open
source software is far more stable, changes far less frequently, and
is as a result far less risky to rely on than traditional commercial
software.
There is second economic incentive for open source, is that the
authors of the open source software are credited directly for their
work. Commercial companies generally prefer their developers to remain
secret to prevent poaching of staff, but that's bad news for the staff
themselves, whose contributions to software projects contributes to
the reputations of the developers.
A further economic incentive for end users of software is the "fit" of
the software application to their organisation. The chances of a given
piece of software fitting the problem is very unlikely to approach
100%, there is always a missing feature of place where the software
has to be bent to fit. In the case of commercial software, the feature
will have to be custom developed and negotiated by the company who
produced the software originally, and this takes lots of time, lots of
money, and the company can just say no. And for people without time or
money, this can prove a dealbreaker. With an open source project, the
end user has the source, and can develop their missing feature
themselves, or by using skills on the open market, rather than being
forced to use the skills of the company who control the commercial
software.
A further significant economic incentive in the favour of open source
is the quality of code. Open source software is visible warts and all,
and the reputation of developers is tied into the quality of the code.
Closed source code is hidden, allowing a multitude of sins to remain
hidden.
Regards,
Graham
--
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
