John Ralls <[email protected]> writes:
> There's not much point to a read-only git repo, as it's pretty easy to just
> use git-svn instead.
Actually, there WOULD be a point -- which is testing our migration
strategy to make sure all the SVN history is correctly in the repo. It
would let us create the git repo, test it, and then swap over to it
later. A small point, but still a point... And a point that git-svn
doesn't really provide. Actually, doesn't git-svn provide ReadWrite
support if you have write access to SVN?
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[email protected] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
