Don't forget to include the list. On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 21:12 +0300, Laimonas Vėbra wrote: > Phil Longstaff wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 20:03 +0300, Laimonas Vėbra wrote: > >> Phil Longstaff wrote: > >> > >>> I would suggest looking through the tutorial. > >>> http://www.cs.aau.dk/~normark/scheme/distribution/laml/tutorial/index.html > >> > >> Looking for WHAT? > >> How to elegantly write structured, validating html report/content in > >> pure scheme...? > > > > Looking for what laml is and what it can do. > > And what it can't do? > You have read it, sure? If you read it, you should have noticed, that > LAML is a big project, full of various stuff. For the reporting we only > need part of the XHTML mirroring: > > > I prefer: > > (p "A simpler table with tr:") > (table 'border "1" > 'class "coytable" > (caption (em "Table caption")) > (tr 'css:vertical-align "top" > (td "1") (td "2")) > (tr (td "3") (td 'css:width opt-logo-width "4")) > ) > > > instead of: > > <table class="coytable" border="0" width="100%"> > <tr valign="top" style="vertical-align: top"> > <?scm (if (access? opt-logofile R_OK) (begin ?> > <td align="left"> > <img align="left" src="<?scm:d opt-logofile ?>" alt="logo" > class="logo" > <?scm (if opt-logo-width (begin ?> > style="width: <?scm:d opt-logo-width ?>" > <?scm )) ?> > > > </td> > <?scm )) ?> > > > (rough clearness comparison) > > Of course, i could be wrong in thinking what the other schemers would > prefer...
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
