On 17.10.2010 20:08, Yawar Amin wrote:
On 2010-10-17, at 04:33, Christian Stimming wrote:
Alternatively, we can admit to ourselves there isn't too big of a point to
have the SQL backends as headline feature, and then we're almost done.
Agreed, SQL can always be a headliner for 2.5. We can iterate rapidly over
version numbers;
there’s no punishment for that. And we can use the 2.4 series to enhance the
report management
dialog box (maybe even turn it into a tab) and keep testing the SQL backend(s).
Well, if we stick to our even numbers are release, odd numbers are development
scheme, then
it could be headline feature only for 2.6 (or 3.0 and there headline feature
will be gnome 3
(or cutecash with Qt as GUI toolkit)). That is at least 2 years away, if I
extrapolate past
experiences.
On the other hand: SQL as of now is only just another data storage, no "real"
database
features like concurrent access from multiple GnuCash instances. So, IMHO, it's
not that
big anyway (from a user perspective, I do appreciate the effort of the devs).
Personally, I have been using the 2.5 branch for my real financial data for at
least
half a year now (with XML backend) and never experienced any problems. So I
agree with
Christian to release 2.4.0 without SQL.
Herbert.
FWIW,
Yawar
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
--
Herbert Thoma
Dipl.-Ing., MBA
Head of Video Group
Multimedia Realtime Systems Department
Fraunhofer IIS
Am Wolfsmantel 33, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
Phone: +49-9131-776-6130
Fax: +49-9131-776-6099
email: [email protected]
www: http://www.iis.fhg.de/
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
