Jumping on the dead horse, I've always disliked the use of the term for "computer program assistant." I've never understood the jump from ancient English religious order to this.
David --- On Fri, 11/5/10, Christian Stimming <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Christian Stimming <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: (+1) Druid -> Assistant in Docs > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Date: Friday, November 5, 2010, 5:23 AM > Zitat von Colin Law <[email protected]>: > > > On 5 November 2010 09:41, Mike Evans <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Just a thought concerning the use of "druid" in > the docs. Earlier this year > >> It was discussed that the use of "druid" is > deprecated in favour of > >> "assistant" in the GNOME Human Interface > Guidelines 2.2.1. It seems that this > >> had not made it into the docs. Should we be > replacing druid with assistant in > >> the docs? > > > > In my opinion, yes. It confused me when I > started with gnucash. I > > had no idea what a druid was. Not that I am sure > the word assistant > > is perfect but it is certainly better than druid. > > +1 from me. Throw out the "druid" wording completely. > > Regards, > > Christian > > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel > _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
