On Sat, 2011-03-26 at 16:37 +0100, Geert Janssens wrote: > On donderdag 24 maart 2011, Christian Stimming wrote: > > Dear Andy, > > > > I've now applied the first two patches from you into SVN. I've not yet > > applied the others because they would immediately change the behaviour. > > > > However, I've tried them myself and I'm very much impressed by the obvious > > increase in quality! This holds for both the on-screen display and also > > when printing to PDF. From what I see here, I'm inclined to add your > > patches immediately and throw out goffice, because the jqplot graphs are > > just so much nicer! > > > > For anyone to check yourself: Get latest SVN, then apply the attached > > patch, and open any of the piechart or barchart reports. > > > > By the way, what happens on a double-click? I only see the graph turns > > blue, but I gues there was some meaning behind this... :-) > > > > Am Freitag, 11. März 2011 schrieb Andy Clayton: > > > Here is a list of at least some of the possible issues I am aware of: > > > * The default coloring could probably be better (plus support for when > > > specific colors are specified) > > > > Yes, but it's good enough to be better than the gog colors, so it's > > sufficient to replace the old one. > > > > > * The legend needs to get out of the way of the graph > > > > Depends on the graph and the data. Maybe it is sufficient if it were > > movable. > > > > > * On bar graphs as more bars get packed in there seems to be too much > > > padding compared to bar width (really small bars with lots of whitespace) > > > > Might be, indeed. > > > > > * On any of the bar graphs over time the x-axis labels are (to me) > > > misleading. A bar labeled 01/01/2011, for example, actually represents > > > the value up to the next x position, say 01/02/2011. Perhaps labeling it > > > with the through date (the inclusive end date) would make more sense, > > > rather than the start? Then again, maybe that is just a matter of > > > preference. Or maybe I will avoid the issue entirely by simplifying the > > > labels to just year, or month and year, for the simple cases. > > > > Yes, but that's a problem with the gog graphs as well. We can throw out gog > > and later come up with a fix to the labels. > > > > > Anyways, feel free to give a try and let me know what could be different > > > or better. > > > > It looks great! Thank you very much for this contribution! > > > > Regards, > > > > Christian > > Agreed, the new plots look much nicer. I like them very much. With a little > bit of polishing like suggested by John and Chris, they can go into trunk as > far as I'm concerned.
Agreed. I have noticed that sometimes the chart legend covers over bars. Phil _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
