On woensdag 21 september 2011, Alex Aycinena wrote: > John, > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 4:09 PM, John Ralls <[email protected]> wrote: > > Alex, > > > > Sounds like a good argument to just use the Action field for your > > numbers. Except for option 3, no changes required to anything except > > your custom reports; option 3 can be implemented as easily with Action > > as with a new field. > > > > Or are you already using the Action field for something else? > > > > Regards, > > John Ralls > > This is a good simplifying suggestion, assuming: > > 1. The use of the Action field the way I intend doesn't interfere with > any other use of it within Gnucash (to respond to your question, I'm > not using it for anything else myself). > 2. It doesn't create confusion in the GUI for users. > > I'll investigate these items and, if they prove to be OK, take that > route instead. > > By the way - does anyone know of any logic in Gnucash that relies on > the Action field? > I know that the business functions write to this field. Most of the transactions created by the business functions contains "Invoice", "Bill" or "Payment". While doing the credit notes analysis I didn't encounter any function so far that relied on this info. I hope I haven't missed a part.
Geert _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
