Hi, Am 23.09.2011 21:18, schrieb Mike Alexander: > --On September 23, 2011 8:51:54 PM +0200 Micha Lenk <[email protected]> >> Does it make sense to backport such changes to the 2.4 branch? >> >> I am asking because I recently uploaded a Debian package for Gnucash >> with enabled Python bindings. Another Debian Developer reported >> parallel builds to fail with Python bindings enabled, so this could >> be of help in the stable branch too... > > Yes, that change and r21301 which also affects building with the Python > bindings could be backported. They are minor enough that the > probability of them causing problems is small especially since they have > not effect at all if the Python bindings are not requested.
Just for the records: I just tried to backport r21301 and r21302 to the 2.4 branch. However it turned out that only r21301 was applicable. This is why there is no backport of r21302 in the 2.4 branch. Regards, Micha _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
