On maandag 10 oktober 2011, Alex Aycinena wrote: > When I was considering adding a new field for the split entry-number, > I did a bunch of work to implement it. John's suggestion to use the > 'action' field instead, however, is appealing and I will go that way > if my investigations prove that it is feasible (I have been busy and > not able to get to it for a while). > > However, I can make all the work I did to implement it available to > you if you like; you can use some, all or none of it as you see fit, > if you decide to implement your new field. It includes adding the new > field, having it included in logging and log replay (which may not > apply to business objects?), and version checking for the xml backend > to prevent prior versions of gnucash from reading the file. It is > fully implemented and tested, but I never committed it. > > Let me know if you would like it and I'll send it along with comments. > > Regards, > > Alex Alex,
I am indeed interested in your code. It ma save a some research. Can you send me a patch (or a git branch if you prefer) ? Thank you, Geert _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
