On Oct 31, 2011, at 8:07 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: > OAnd by the way, I don't see much use for safe_strcmp anymore in gnucash. I'd > rather user g_strcmp0, which behaves exactly the same, but is part of glibc. > Our code is heavily dependent on glibc anyway, so I prefer to use its > convenience functions over maintaining our own.
Yes, please. Let's prefer GLib utilities. No need to make a special effort, just whenever you notice something that can be replaced with a GLib function or macro, change it out. Regards, John Ralls _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
