Geert Janssens <[email protected]> writes:
> Forgot to mention: Gtk3 was indeed not on the agenda for 2.6. 2.6 is
> only meant to be *ready* to be migrated. This means getting rid of all
> the deprecated gtk symbols. Other than the register this is done. So
> the register rewrite is actually important for this goal, whether we
> use the GtkTreeView approach or the libgnome->cairo route.
Personnaly I'd rather see us move to Qt instead of Gtk3 when that
decision has to be made. My reasoning is that I think the Gtk
developers have lost sight of their target audience, and as a result
keep removing features that are vital. It's too much of a loose
firehose, and IMHO shouldn't be supported anymore. Indeed, for my next
desktop re-install I plan to move away from a Gnome desktop and over to
XFCE..
Note that this has nothing to do with the 2.6 release, but it's
something we should think about when contemplating a move to gtk3.
> Geert
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[email protected] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
