Hmm, I never really looked at those details. Isn't it odd to call a mailing- list -patches and then don't send patches to it, but only change summaries ?
A historical issue I suppose... Would the move to git be a good moment to fix this mistake ? Or do you prefer to keep things as they currently are. It's pretty easy to change what list gets which mails. Geert On Wednesday 29 May 2013 10:38:16 Derek Atkins wrote: > Geert, > > It looks like we have the mail to -changes and -patches backwards. The > summary is going to -changes and the diffs are going to -patches. This > is the reverse of what we were doing with subversion. > > -derek > > Geert Janssens <[email protected]> writes: > > The beta branch has been updated > > > > via https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash-htdocs/commit/38f10de6 > > (commit) > > > > from https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash-htdocs/commit/0983e00e > > (commit) > > > > - Log ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > commit 38f10de6f625eae00b1e1b80ea3b64cb68f9658f > > Author: Geert Janssens <[email protected]> > > Date: Wed May 29 16:26:02 2013 +0200 > > > > Dummy change in beta > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Summary of changes: > > README | 1 - > > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > hooks/post-receive _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
