On May 31, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Geert Janssens <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Friday 31 May 2013 06:52:49 John Ralls wrote: > > On May 31, 2013, at 1:19 AM, Geert Janssens <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > I'll do it. > > > > > > What do I do with the current default assignees ? Just delete them > > > or move them to the default qa contact or default cc list ? > > I'd move both default contact and default qa to default cc, but it > > looks like you already just moved contact to cc, which works too. > > > > Regards, > > John Ralls > > I actually like the idea of setting both default assignee and qa contact to > the dummy accounts and have set things up like that. > > That allows us to continue to take assignment on bugs we intend to work on > and still have all subscribed users follow the bug (because the qa contact > remains the dummy user). > > The next question is of course if we really want to keep people in the > default cc list. This list can only be modified by GnuCash Developers. Isn't > the whole idea that everyone now can choose for themselves which groups they > like to follow ? > > That will take some manual action of each person that was currently receiving > bug reports already. > > I have sent an announcement in a separate mail with a list of currently cc'd > users and ask all to update their own bugzilla mail preferences. > > The end goal is to empty the cc lists eventually. OK. I wonder how many of the email addresses will turn out to be dead. It's a worthwhile exercise regardless. I does seem that the default cc list allows devs to tailor their bugmail a bit more finely: Someone might want to get bugmail on a particular module instead of all of the modules that are assigned to alias, which would mean that the CC lists wouldn't be empty. Regards, John Ralls _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
