On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 08:54:10PM +0100, Felix Schwarz wrote: > > Am 16.03.2014 20:38, schrieb John Ralls: > > The signature of xaccAccountGetName is const char* xaccAccountGetName > > (const Account *); the const was added in 2005. A "const Account *" is not > > the same as an "Account const *": The former means that the contents of the > > pointer won't change, the latter means that the pointer itself won't change > > (see https://www.cs.bu.edu/teaching/cpp/const/). > > > > Somewhere in the SWIG-generated Python-to-C translation code the argument > > type is wrong, but it's not directly in the stack trace from Python. It's > > more likely due to a change in SWIG than to a change in GnuCash. > > Thank you very much for the insights - seems really easy to miss. I'll take a > look at the SWIG files and the generated code then. > > But that means it would be interesting if gnucash's example script > "new_book_with_opening_balances.py" works for anyone, right? If we had a > success report this might provide some insight about the relevant swig > changes. >
not all the example scripts work - but this one does for me (the business ones have issues) also you need slightly different arguments now because of the xml/sqlite possibility David _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
