John Ralls <[email protected]> writes:
> I agree that filenames should reflect the class that they implement,
> when they do so, and I’ll add that in general a file should implement
> only one class. Capitalization is OK as long as one keeps in mind that
> the Mac file system is normally case-preserving but case-insensitive,
> so e.g. Account.h and account.h will map to the same file.
>
> I don’t think we want to give each directory its own namespace. I’m
> not even sure that we want any namespaces inside ‘gnucash’.
I kind of like the Ruby on Rails method, where the file name is the
lower-case snake form of the class name. E.g., a class Account would be
in a source file account.[ch], a class ScheduledTransaction would be in
a file scheduled_transaction.[ch], etc.
I agree that we don't need to have a directory for the namespace, and I
also don't think we need to have namespaces for each "module/library".
E.g., I don't think we need GnuCash::Engine::Account. I suspect doing
so would just add complexity where it might not be warranted.
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[email protected] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
