That's a good proposal. Go for it. Regards, Geert
John Ralls <[email protected]> schreef op 26 augustus 2017 23:02:53 CEST: >We're almost ready to release 2.7.0, I just need to figure out why the >build script locks up the Win10 VM build server. > >I propose to create an "unstable" branch and release the 2.7.x series >from that, so all 2.7.x bug fixes and any remaining work for the 2.8.x >would go to that branch; long-term development could continue in master >(e.g. Aaron Laws has started converting Account.c to Account.cpp). > >Periodic merges would be maint->unstable and unstable->master with >"periodic" meaning at least immediately before each 2.7.x release. > >When we release 2.8.0, we'll also release 2.6.20, do a final merge >maint->unstable, delete maint and rename unstable to maint. At that >point we'll be back to two active branches until we start the 2.9 alpha >releases around 4 years from now. > >Any objections or concerns? > >Regards, >John Ralls > >_______________________________________________ >gnucash-devel mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel Sent from my smartphone. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
