On 03/03/2018 18:52, D via gnucash-devel wrote:
I think having nearest in time use future dates relative to the report date is
not useful. Mind you, matching a broker statement for value (as opposed to
holdings) is perhaps equally not useful.
I guess I could see a point to a nearest in time using later dates (for
example, when the date history is sparse, and the only earlier date is much
earlier). But perhaps your suggestion of a separate setting would solve the
dilemma.
Where the heck do you get future prices from ?
Seriously. This is valuable information. I want to know how you know.
In any event, why aren't you telling gnc what it needs to know so it can
multiply some numbers together?
It is a *person* that says what a commodity was worth on a date not gnc
after all.
--
Wm
never vote for a man that doesn't understand that imposing a tax on
metal mauy work in the inverse to what he expects. duh
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel