> On May 23, 2018, at 7:28 AM, Derek Atkins <warl...@mit.edu> wrote: > >> However as we host bugzilla at gnucash.org, it should be >> obvious the database is about gnucash. >> So perhaps we can reuse the product field for a more useful >> separation of bugs >> How about having "Gnucash" for that program, "Documentation" >> for all documentation related bugs and "Website" for our website related >> bugs >> Documentation and Website are currently components of gnucash so they >> would be moved. >> This split more or less follows the same separation as we have in >> git. If we take that as a guide we may also want an "OS integration" >> product covering issues specific to the Windows and OS X integration >> repos (gnucash-on-windows and gnucash-on-osx)
If creating a product for ‘Website’ would a ‘Wiki’, ‘Mailman’ and and dare I say, ’GnuCash-Bugzilla’ products section also be in order? (the last being not for the software, but for the GnuCash instance of it) Regards, Adrien _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel