On 1/26/19 10:54 PM, Christopher Lam wrote: > Stephen please spend some CPU burning time on my chartJS branch which > needs beta testing? > > $git clone > https://github.com/christopherlam/gnucash/tree/maint-chartjs-budget-barchart
Thought I'd start this while headed toward some z's. Too tired to figure out what happened. git clone https://github.com/christopherlam/gnucash/tree/maint-chartjs-budget-barchart Cloning into 'maint-chartjs-budget-barchart'... fatal: repository 'https://github.com/christopherlam/gnucash/tree/maint-chartjs-budget-barchart/' not found --Steve > > > On 27/1/19 2:52 pm, Stephen M. Butler wrote: >> On 1/26/19 10:29 PM, John Ralls wrote: >>> Stephen, >>> >>> By all means learn about git bisect, it's an extremely useful >>> troubleshooting tool. But don't exercise yourself too much about >>> this particular failure, Chris and I know exactly what commit caused >>> it and that the underlying cause is a bug in ICU (International >>> Components for Unicode, http://site.icu-project.org/) versions 57-62. >> I figured the devs were way ahead of me. And I'm burning the CPU this >> evening finding that I can't compile 3.4-21 thru (I'm guessing) 3.4-38. >> I'm up to 3.4-29 at this point and already know that -37 and -38 don't >> compile on my box. But -39, -40, and -43 do. Don't know about -41 and >> -42 (and probably won't check them). >> >> Busy day tomorrow so I doubt the cpu will even get warmed up! It's >> pushing 11 pm so I'll call it quits on this exercise. >> >> Thanks for the details. >> >> --Steve >> >>> I had thought that the problem was confined to 1969, but tonight got >>> https://bugs.gnucash.org/show_bug.cgi?id=797067 which makes me think >>> that it's every year, so more testing needed. >>> >>> Regards, >>> John Ralls >>> >>> >>>> On Jan 26, 2019, at 5:55 PM, Stephen M. Butler <kg...@arrl.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 1/26/19 3:13 AM, Christopher Lam wrote: >>>>> Another experiment. Try prefix your build with "TZ=UTC " on current >>>>> maint. >>>>> >>>>> Eg if using ninja, it'll be "TZ=UTC ninja check" >>>> TZ=UTC dpkg- -rfakeroot -b -uc >>>> >>>> .... >>>> >>>> End testing: Jan 27 01:47 UTC >>>> + exit 2 >>>> debian/rules:65: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_test' failed >>>> make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_test] Error 2 >>>> make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/steve/Projects/GnuCash/gnucash' >>>> debian/rules:24: recipe for target 'build' failed >>>> make: *** [build] Error 2 >>>> dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build subprocess returned exit >>>> status 2 >>>> >>>> Same error -- Test 109 that fails. >>>> >>>> >>>> This is with the patches for 3.4. I verified before Sabbath that 3.4 >>>> builds and passes the tests. Tried your test first thing this evening >>>> after git checkout maint and git pull. I am at 3.4-43-g84d1c3645 >>>> which >>>> builds but doesn't pass the tests. So, I could build turning off the >>>> test step. >>>> >>>> However, Friday I was learning more about git bisect to see if I could >>>> figure out which patch caused the tests to start failing. However, a >>>> couple of items got in the way: 1--time; 2--some commits don't >>>> build. >>>> That messed me up a bit. So, I may start over again with the bisect >>>> (just for my own edification) and see what happens. Maybe this time >>>> I'll do a git describe each time and take notes so I'll be a little >>>> more >>>> cognizant of what I'm learning. <<did that make sense>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --Steve (in the dark) >>>> >>>>> On Fri., 25 Jan. 2019, 11:52 Stephen M. Butler <kg...@arrl.net >>>>> <mailto:kg...@arrl.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 1/24/19 7:36 PM, Christopher Lam wrote: >>>>>> Revert is a git terminology, not a gnucash one. Welcome to version >>>>>> control. >>>>> That's the manual to which I referred. It meant something >>>>> else to my >>>>> mind when I first saw your post. But, after further thought, my >>>>> previous thought was faulty. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> My first boss after college would draw a picture to describe the >>>>> difference between a bug and a feature. >>>>> >>>>> I can't draw so a word will have to do (at less than a thousand >>>>> words)! >>>>> >>>>> BUG: draw stick figure. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> FEATURE: Add pants, tie, gloves, shoes and a top hat. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> MORAL: A feature is a bug all dressed up and ready to go out. >>>>> >>>>>> Please remember this revert is reverting a buggy code with a >>>>> previous >>>>>> buggy code, so, cannot be consisted safe to package; best wait until >>>>>> the clever devs can find a proper fix for gnc-date. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri., 25 Jan. 2019, 05:46 Stephen M. Butler <kg...@arrl.net >>>>> <mailto:kg...@arrl.net> >>>>>> <mailto:kg...@arrl.net <mailto:kg...@arrl.net>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> OH! Light bulb on! >>>>>> OK. I understand what you said earlier. I'll put the patches >>>>>> back into >>>>>> the packaging. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for clearing that up. >>>>>> >>>>>> --Steve >>>>>> >>>>>> PS Looking in manual for 'revert' command. > -- Stephen M Butler, PMP, PSM stephen.m.butle...@gmail.com kg...@arrl.net 253-350-0166 ------------------------------------------- GnuPG Fingerprint: 8A25 9726 D439 758D D846 E5D4 282A 5477 0385 81D8 _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel