I do have some experience with Cmake. We had a fairly mature cmake system that I helped maintain and develop which built our code base for Linux and Windows (both native compilers) but it's been 2 years since I've done any development so everything is some relearning of course.
-----Original Message----- From: John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2025 11:07 AM To: russ.go...@gmail.com Cc: gnucash-devel <gnucash-devel@gnucash.org> Subject: Re: CMake technical debt Not for me. Build system problems are a major pain point so they tend to get attended to. That doesn’t mean there aren’t things that could be done better. Do you have a lot of experience with cmake? Regards, John Ralls > On Mar 30, 2025, at 8:33 AM, <russ.go...@gmail.com> <russ.go...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I’m now building successfully all the opaque pieces on windows, and it seems > to install and run. > I was wanting to get more familiar with the anatomy/topology of the code base. > I was thinking of doing something in the CMake realm to gain some familiarity > there. > Is there anything that is annoying the developers that would be beneficial > to fix/change in CMake realm but is not critical path for anything? > Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-devel mailing list > gnucash-devel@gnucash.org > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
