Andreas Bogk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hm, makes sense in a way. Under that circumstances, I think it would
> be better to have a base RPM without Postgres, and a RPM with the
> Postgres backend.
Yea, and that's what was proposed. Someone just needs to setup the
SPEC file to emit two RPMs, gnucash and gnucash-postgres, with the
appropriate files.
> Andreas
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
