> GnuCash is _already_ fabulously complex to get compiled. It has dependancies > on a huge horde of GNOME libraries, plus Guile, plus bits written using M4 and > the whole autoconf tool stream. It even includes some SQL code. > > You can argue for adding some more dependencies on lex/yacc (or should it be > flex/bison?; it is perfectly legitimate for others to argue the contrary.
You've raised lots of very valid concerns, but I'm afraid my point got lost. I wanted to explore what a formula language that would be accessible to normal users (people who use Quicken -- not users who would be writing reports in Scheme) might look like. Don't worry about it. It's not like I plan on doing anything about it anytime soon. _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
