On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 12:57, Christopher Browne wrote: > I think it's fair to say that by the time SOAP could /conceivably/ reach > a level of maturity that would allow it to be generally adopted, CORBA > will have been mature, having had implementations that have been > efficiently interoperating for a goodly 5 years or more. > > Why go with something that will continue to be flaky for years to come > when there's an /already mature/ technology that is /already part of > GNOME/?
Sure, as I said in my original message, I wasn't advocating SOAP, just objecting to what I thought was a misleading statement. But you are both right, CORBA is more mature and better supported in Gnome. I think a set of GnuCash bonobo controls that could be embedded in other apps would be a very nice addition to GnuCash, not that I am volunteering to write them :) dave
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
